Priorities! Priorities! Priorities! The tradeoffs that we're facing today

I’ve been reflecting about the next chapter of my serving College Ward as your Councillor.  

My aim was, for the first year or two, to prioritize the relationship with residents. I wanted people to know that they could find me, they could count on me to listen, and they could have confidence that I was always serving them with honesty and integrity.  

Although that journey is never complete, residents’ familiarity with me at this year’s Skating Party and your response to our Annual Progress Report have done a great deal to confirm that we in the College Ward office have been on the right track. It’s meaningful to me, after 3 years, to recognize familiar faces and to remember details about residents’ families, their stories, and to share memories.  

Moving into the latter half of my term, I am considering some of the big-ticket policy items, both in terms of finances but also residential impact. Without question, I will continue to communicate regularly, have annual events, and be present in the ward. My interests lay more on some tradeoffs that I think we are facing as a city, ones that I think aren’t being positioned in a clear enough way for residents to weigh in. I’ll offer up a few.

1. Zoning By-law

The City is executing its Official Plan and further recent Provincial Policy Statements and Bill 23 by writing out how it will grow and intensify in the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw Review. If there was a Venn Diagram for how important but how dry this subject is, it would look like this:   

 

 

But it really matters! So let me zero in on the part of it that I think can catch your attention: PARKING. The Zoning By-law determines where people can park.  

Do you want people to be able to park in their backyards so that we don’t have to see cars from the front? Widen their front driveways so there's less street parking? Or park on the street because we want to preserve the greenspace of the lawn?  

Think about stormwater management vs. car storage. Paved parking means more water run-off onto the street, onto their neighbours’ property, maybe into basements. When we allow expanded parking areas, we have to consider snow melt and rainwater, too. 

So where do the cars go? Would you be ok with smaller neighbourhood parking garages that served some of the nearby residents? Who would maintain and pay for that garage? Would it be public or private? 

Right now, I think the option of allowing people to widen their driveways seems to be popular, and it’s been happening contravening the bylaw anyhow. If a maximum percentage of a lot was preserved as greenspace that included both the back and front yards, I think it could be managed reasonably. What would you do? Let me know! 

2. City revenues

I am increasingly concerned that we aren’t having a real conversation at the City of Ottawa about what things cost. For example, we were handed 4 new Asset Management Plans last year from the City. Those plans estimate what we need to do in terms of road resurfacing, sidewalk maintenance, public building and facilities upkeep, sewer and water replacement, etc. The absolutely necessary costs of keeping the city running.  

 The forecasted spending over the next 10 years exceeds total planned capital budgets by $3 billion so we need to find that money. Federal or provincial transfers? Increased property taxes? There is no doubt that this is a challenge felt by municipalities across the country and that the solution isn’t solely in property taxation, you can see the numbers greatly exceed what is possible.  

But my concern is that when we get to budget season, we begin by setting a tax cap that is a percentage of last year’s budget, rather than determining what it costs to manage the city and working from there. We have been doing our budgeting like this for over 12 years, making incremental changes from the previous year with no larger adjustments to a dramatically changing outside world. This leaves us underfunded year after year, and it means our most critical infrastructure is crumbling. Ever wonder why the City is so slow to repave your street? Replace wading pools in parks? That’s part of the reason. 

Later this year City Council will be presented with a series of financial strategies to address that shortfall that will include, inevitably, selling off assets.  

I know for some properties this will have been a long time coming but I also worry that we will be criticized for not maintaining our assets over the last 2 decades so that we might be able to hold onto more public assets.  

Similarly, our road resurfacing budget still focuses on arterial road at the expense of local roads. When asked, the Roads team says that they could do more with more budget and ramp up construction over the next 5 years to bring local roads into a state of good repair. In the meantime, further delays in maintenance compound residents’ frustration and personal expense.  

What do you think about the idea of paying more now instead of more later, or do you think we are taking the right approach? 

3. Transportation Master Plan   

The City of Ottawa, post-amalgamation, is now responsible for 6000 km of road. This means we are expected to maintain them, to clear snow from them, to salt and sweep them. Our road services budget for 2025 was over $1.4 billion, which is roughly 25% of our annual budget. The Transportation Master Plan coming to Committee and Council in 2025 will set new mode share targets across our city and suggest that we invest our capital dollars in transportation infrastructure to support those mode share targets, meaning that we will invest in infrastructure that supports more people moving from their cars to transit, cycling and walking for different trips. My feeling is that we need to set aggressive targets for areas that have nearby services to do so, so that those trips needed to be taken by car are clear of people who didn’t need to take a car that day and could walk or take a train. I worry when we talk about a balanced approach to transportation planning in that it costs us money every time we don’t invest in real transportation choice for people: when more people use their cars because they have no real other options, we then have more pressure to spend in our most expensive budget area.  

I would suggest that our neighbourhoods inside the Greenbelt would love more walkability if we had the local shops and services we needed. The future of our transportation network must work hand in hand with our new zoning (see above) to create greater density and more residents that can shop locally and make local businesses viable. 

Some of the most satisfying parts of the job have been solving local problems. Our office loves digging into the details and closing a case. But if I reconnect to the reasons I ran for office, it was to support building a City that we could all be proud of. There is beauty in the small things, but municipalities are behemoths. The larger questions of policy and fiscal management are coming forward, and I believe that I was elected by residents to stay curious, thoughtful, and sometimes challenge the status quo. But I would like to hear from you too. Email me at [email protected] to offer feedback on the Zoning Bylaw, City Revenues and taxation, transportation, and any other policy priorities that are on your mind. We spent the last 2 years in office building a strong foundation and now we are looking forward to expanding our dialogue with our neighbours in College Ward.

Latest posts

Nazi symbols ban

On March 26, 2025, I will table a motion at Council which calls on the federal government to ban Nazi symbols.  

College Ward is home to Ottawa’s largest Jewish community and we have seen a sharp rise in antisemitism here. Groups and individuals now brashly displaying this terrible symbol of hate on their vehicles, clothing, and signs.  

18 countries have banned this symbol and I believe it is time for Canadians to do so as well. 

I have been working with B'nai Brith Canada, who currently have a campaign to encourage the federal government to ban Nazi symbols such as the Nazi hooked cross (Hakenkreuz). It is sometimes called a swastika, which is a Sanskrit word we're not using out of respect to the Hindu community, where this has been an ancient holy symbol for hundreds of years. 

My motion, which Mayor Sutcliffe has kindly seconded, calls on Council to write to the federal government in support of B'nai Brith Canada's campaign. It also calls on the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (where I'm a member of the National Board of Directors) to consider a similar motion. 

I expect the motion to be debated and voted on at the following Council meeting on April 16, 2025.

 

Motion to ban Nazi symbols

Press release

Countries where Nazi symbols are banned

Non-governmental organizations that support the ban

Canadian jurisdictions that have endorsed the B’nai Brith Canada campaign to ban Nazi symbols

Province of Saskatchewan

Region of Durham

City of Pickering

Town of Whitby

X and Public Engagement: who should control the City’s relationship with our residents?

Today, the Finance and Corporate Services Committee voted down Councillor Dudas’ motion to move away from social media platform X  as a City communications tool (you can read the motion here). I am grateful to Councillor Dudas for her leadership on this.

The prevailing argument against the motion was that since the City had over 250, 000 followers on X (how many active accounts, how many live people, how many residents of the City, not known or questioned) it would be unwise to pivot to a different platform and risk losing contact.

Another argument that was given suggested that, with the evolution of X as an unsafe place for civic discourse, any new platform could evolve in kind, meaning the City might be always in a state of trying to find the new best place to share its updates.

Ontario election - your questions, answered by the candidates

At the beginning of the Ontario Provincial election, I asked residents for municipal-related questions they'd like candidates to answer. My team gathered the questions and sent them to each of the campaigns for the Green Party, Liberal Party, NDP, and PC Party candidates in the ridings of Nepean and Ottawa West-Nepean.

Only two candidates responded. You can read their responses below.

Please remember to vote on February 27, 2025!

Response from Chandra Pasma, Ontario NDP candidate, Ottawa West-Nepean

Response from Brett Szmul, Ontario Liberal candidate, Ottawa West-Nepean

 

Share this post

Take action

Upcoming Events

Sign up for updates